What Happened When General Cariapa Met Mahatma Gandhi

Some days ago I saw an short article on what happened when Major general Cariapa(COAS of Indian Army after Independence and Later an Field Marshal)  met Mahatma Gandhi.

There is an always an conflict between the thinking and ideology of the Followers of great Freedom Fighters and leaders,May be because still they don't understand the ideology or they don't want to understand it or the other possibility can be that i don't understand them whatever their are lots of possibilities Never matters.


Mahatma Gandhi is known For his Non-Violence and satyagrah(Which is still the not clear between an large number of people)  which was accepted by an large number of people during the independence struggle and also after that,And i know the Fact that Now Lots of Indian hate him for this i don't know why Whereas he is being internationally accepted by an large number of peoples,My Only dream is to Join the Indian Army at any cost and i am trying my best for it But still i Love the Way Suggested by him obviously i can't follow the path of Non-Violence But I love his ideology which is based satyagrah and which includes the Non-Violence in it.Never Try to think that it's easy to understand the word Satyagrah.

Okay,Now come to that story i am quoting the story Here-

While undergoing the course in the Imperial Defence College in London as a major general in early 1947, General Cariappa was quoted as advocating that Jawahar Lal Nehru and Jinnah should meet to work out a solution without partitioning India and in any event division of the Indian Army should be averted. Gandhiji criticised him for a military man expressing views on politics in his weekly column in The Harijan. When General Cariappa returned to India he called on Gandhiji who was staying in the Bhangi Colony. When he reached Gandhiji's cottage, the meticulous solider took off his shoes before entering the hut. Gandhiji who knew enough about soldiering having served in the battle field in South Africa during the Zulu war, told him that his shoes were part of his uniform and therefore it was not proper to take them off. The General replied that according to the Indian tradition a person did not wear shoes in the presence of a deity, mahatmas and saints. After some polite conversation, General Cariappa came to the point. He told Gandhiji, "I cannot do my duty well by the country if I concentrate only on telling troops of nonviolence, all the time, subordinating their main task of preparing themselves efficiently to be good soldiers. So I ask you, please to give me the child's guide to knowledge-tell me please, how I can put this over, that is, the spirit of nonviolence to the troops without endangering their sense of duty to train themselves well professionally as soldiers. "Gandhiji replied, "You have asked me to tell you in tangible and concrete form how you can put over to the troops the need for nonviolence. I am still groping in the dark for the answer. I will find it and give it to you some day." You will find this story in Pyarelal's book "Mahatma Gandhi: the Last Phase". Pyarelal was Gandhiji's private secretary at the time.
You can see this short article on lots of Blogs and sites,But do you really know who have said it and from where it have been taken or it is the Full Story?
Most probably No!
Okay Let me tell you The above Lines were said by K. Subrahmanyam(A Renowned Personallity Who is No More with us You can Get Details about him on Wikipedia).

Okay Now the question Arises Did Gandhi failed To answer him??
Do Really a person Like him Can't answer that Question,Yes He Never answered This question,He said that he will give the answer in some days But he failed to answered it as he was shot down in the next month of this incident,This is an incident of Dec 1947 and he was killed in Jan 1948.
But Still this is not the Complete story The Story is yet Incompleted and Judging a personality on an Half Story Is Totally Unjustified,So Here are the next lines said by 
K. Subrahmanyam

This was the honest answer of the apostle of nonviolene to the first soldier of the independent India. He did not have an answer on how to defend India using nonviolence. This happened in December 1947. Next month the Mahatma was assassinated. Even as Gandhiji was searching for an answer how to use nonviolence in defence, he approved and indeed strongly supported the use of the Indian Army to defend Kashmir against Pakistani invasion. Brigadier L.P. Sen obtained Gandhiji's blessings before he flew down to Srinagar to assume his command.
It would have required enormous moral courage on the part of General Carriappa to raise the issue of nonviolence in defence with the Mahatma. It is a pity that this exchange between the Mahatma and the General had not been publicised widely. This exchange made it clear that Gandhiji who successfully practised nonviolence in the offensive mode vis a vis the British Raj which was on the defensive, had not solved the problem of application of non-violence to defence and therefore, as was demonstrated in Kashmir, was prepared to support the use of the Indian Army in defence. Even today this exchange has not been made known to most of the people in the nation. If that had happened, the wide-spread belief that Gandhian values were responsible for the neglect of defence in the earlier years of our freedom would not be there. In fact, Gandhian values and approach have been used as a convenient alibi by people who did not understand Gandhi. The Mahatma, as he himself made clear often, was not a pacifist. He always maintained that violence was better than cowardice.
You People May think What's the use of this article?
This is just to clear the whole story,The way Article is presented Shows an Conflict between the Thinking of two great personalities which never existed General Cariapa Have always respected Mahatma gandhi and Mahatma Gandhi have also Done the same thing.
The words said by 
K. Subrahmanyam clearly states that how much they have respected each other and how polite discussion was between both the peoples.
ANyone may Love the ideology or can hate it but that never means you should incult him